Tuesday, 13 May 2008
How to get revenge the easy way
Honestly - the trouble that women go to to get revenge on their ex-boyfriends. Just take a butcher's at this Daily Mail story if you don't believe me. Here we have women who spend days or even weeks setting up blogs, hacking into their ex-fellows' e-mail accounts or changing their profiles on dating sites. The sheer amount of hard work involves makes me want to curl up and go to sleep, trust me it does. If that is not enough, when they get the free publicity courtesy of the Mail's story, then they start to moan about the inaccuracies that it contains. Then they go on to waste yet more of their lives trying to obtain a retraction from the paper, or whine in comment boxes about some other girl's take on the matter. Someone should tell these girls that the best publicity is free publicity and that there is hardly any such thing as bad publicity. Meanwhile, the blokes who are the targets of all this are sat in their local swill shops, poring beer down their necks and having a laugh with their mates. Not only that, but all the free publicity that the scandal has generated may even make a man more interesting to other females who could quite likely want to know if he really is as his ex described him on her blog. Sorry, girls, but all you are going to get out of nonsense like this is a bit of female sympathy, that may turn out to be nothing more than schadenfreude when you get right down to it. If you think that it will hurt the man that you now loath you are living in a fantasy world: his mates will be clapping him on the back and telling what a fine fellow he is and various bits of talent will quite fancy a night between the sheets with him. To make matters even worse for you girls, I'm sorry to have to tell you that when it comes to the revenge game the blokes are just better at it than you. Sorry, girls, but that just happens to be the truth. What a guy will do is take that secret video that he made, the one that only he and she were ever supposed to watch, and upload it to the web. Then he will send out a few e-mails and wait until the video goes viral. Pretty soon the whole world will have seen his little epic. You don't believe me? This video which features a girl named Caylynn was uploaded in 2001 and it is still a firm favourite all across the web. God knows how many millions of people have watched it over the years. Even more famous, if that is possible, are the Libby Hoeller series of videos, which have now been edited into three parts for your viewing pleasure. She made them for her boyfriend, but then decided to dump him for someone else. Quick as a flash he uploaded her artistic efforts to the web and the lovely Libby became an overnight internet sensation. So girls, enjoy your revenge by all means. Just don't spend to much time over it, and learn to take it properly, that's all. Learn from the guys that the web is there to help you, so you don't have to do all that much actual work. Guys: keep uploading the tasty home made porn epics and remember that the resulting publicity will probably do wonders for your sex life in the future. This has been a public service posting brought to you by your avuncular Uncle Exile. Do you fancy a leg over tonight? Labels: Sleaze |
posted by Exile at 12:05 AM
Cynical as ever I see.
Smug? Yup, think so.
But before you get too comfortable, perhaps you'd better google "felicity jane lowde cyberstalker". Then you might have some idea of the dog doo you're treading in.
That might be one jolly little comment you come to regret.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/text/print.html?in_article_id=458109&in_page_id=1770
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/08/cyberstalker_in_custody/
http://www.oxfordmail.net/news/headlines/display.var.1456078.0.cyberstalker_caught.php
http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/july+7+victim+targeted+by+cyberstalker/556877
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6249594.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1552733/July-7-survivor-harassed-by-internet-stalker.html
You idiot. You complete plonker.
Lowde is a serious nutter who went to jail for harassment last year.
North, as widely reported, was the victim the CPS built the case around, presumably because her case was the most extreme and the best-evidenced and because she is an obviously sympathetic and credible witness.
But Lowde was/is a serial abuser with dozens of victims. Natalie Lue was one of the 16 other people protected from Lowde by a criminal ASBO.
Lowde is banned from harassing and abusing Lue, and Lue warns her off in the comments. Lowde, by breaching the CRASBO is looking at up to 5 years in chokey.
You might want to read the links, read what you have obviously not even read properly -
and cross your fingers and pray that the mad Lowde doesn't decide to come after you.
Think its funny?
Lowde isn't funny. Lowde got the MAXIMUM sentence for harassment.
And she's been jailed for harassment before.
Harassing her ex as it happens - and his father. She was jailed for it in 2002.
She's the revenger cyber bunny boiler. Not Lue.
Meanwhile, Natalie Lue's complaint against the Mail's inaccurate defamatory article is being investigated by the PCC.
You total, total idiot. So eager to jump in with the jibes that you couldn't even do th most basic of research - NML's comments should have given you a clue that you were dealing not with a girlie blog spat but with a convicted abusive nutcase - Lowde.
Muppet. Well, the joke's on you
And - you twerp- the WHOLE POINT of Natalie's complaint to the Mail is that the story is 100% inaccurate.
Dunno about the two other women, but none of the stuff theyw rote about her was true.
She's happily settled with a partner and a baby, for heaven's sake.
The Mail article is defamatory - and it sparked off Natalie's abusive stalker to boot which made it even worse.
Hence general blogger outrage.
You prat.
Which you clearly didn't read.
'Morning all,
I'd just like to welcome at least one member of Gimlet's mongish crew to the blog.
Right, breakfast for me, and lessons in basic HTML for the webmong. That's the order of business for today.
And this afternoon doubtless it's off to find a car crash to laugh at.
Webmong indeed.
Being called a 'webmong' by a complete plonker who can't grasp the difference between
a) A professional writer in her 30's with a partner and baby who has been libelled and defamed by the Mail, reacting to the libel and defamation who is concerned to see that a convicted criminal harasser, Felicity Lowde, 42, is breaching the terms of her ASBO and committing a criminal offence by writing about her in a defamatory way that constitutes further harassment
b) Two 'girls' having a spat.
If this is the standard of your 'research', I'm glad I don't read your blog.
Wazzock.
But you are reading it, aren't you? Otherwise you wouldn't be able to leave your old wank in the comment box, would you?
I see that comment five came from the University of Sussex and the one above this from the City.
Yup, it's Gimlet's Mongish Crew - even to the extent of copying my Lancashire dialect.
Welcome, webmongs, and make yourselves comfy.
Comment five was by you.
Tosser.
A quick sniff around and you're sussed. Just a web traffic whore with a nasty line in wind ups, aren't you?
The internet was made for idiots and cowards. That's you in both columns.
PS: I'm anon because felicity lowde is a criminal harasser.
*waits for playground retort from brainy exile man*
Yes, you are right, it was number four...
You are anonymous because you are a webmong who used to troll along to The Exile until I saw you off. You are either Gimlet, or one of his two or three mates. You post as anonymous because you want folk to believe that there are lots of you.
Sorry, but Gimlet doesn't have that many friends. Gimlet, as I just love pointing out, is a sad, short-arsed little fucker who only had Mrs Hand and her five daughters for company at Oxford.
2, 6 and 9 was me. Look at grammar and syntax for proof.
No clue who the others are.
§`§
(my mark)
PS: not the faintest idea who 'gimlet' is either.
§`§
Is there any particular reason why you deleted my comment Exile?
I don't delete comments - ever!
It's good to know that you're not deleting so we'll chalk it up to a cyber error.
Speaking of facts Exile, I note in your post (which btw clearly shows that you're not fond of a bit of fact checking and research yourself - you'd do well at the Mail), I note in your post that you say "The sheer amount of hard work involves makes me want to curl up and go to sleep, trust me"
Well it's a shame you didn't "curl up and go to sleep" because instead of getting your facts straight, you've stirred the pot over at the cyberstalkers and added fat to the fire over here.
I don't think I need to explain the situation re the ASBO any further considering that it's been very clearly explained to you and you even had the pleasure of reading the terms of the order.
In light of the fact that you read my "moan", it would have taken you about 5 mins to discover the "facts" for yourself. But then you couldn't stir the pot then could you!
Btw, what have I got to do with the credit crunch?
NML,
Or I could put it down to your being a bit of a bimbo who doesn't understand things.
Whatever, let me explain one thing very, very slowly. I don't give a ripe and smelly fart about this barnie that is going on between various bloody women. The posting was written on Sunday and all I did was add the second paragraph when I saw the fun and games. The AIM of the posting, which you don't seem to be able to grasp, was to tell folk about the Libby Hoeller et al videos. It is hardly my fault that a gang of brainless birds with nothing better to do with their lives can't read things properly.
Secondly, stop mithering me about the facts of a case that I don't give a stuff about. What you want is for me to take your side. Sorry, darling, but that isn't going to happen. I am strictly neutral in this cat fight.
Finally, and just to show you what a decent soul I am, I had a shuftie at your blog. Relationships??? Darling, if you want to keep a bloke happy you make sure that his belly is filled regularly and his balls emptied with the same frequency. That is all you need to know about blokes, and I now award you the certificate in relationships..
Coming up at midnight central - great cat fights I have seen!
Exile, Stick up a video of two girls fighting. Sums it all up I think.
One-Tracker,
You are a genius! My next posting will have a cat fight video embedded in it, and I am doing the same with the publicity that will be posted at The Exile.
NML,
Sorry that I missed your question the first time around. What do you have to do with the credit crunch? Dunno, you tell me.
The blog was set up last August as a money maker. The target readership consisted of my fellow money bloggers. I got bored with that so decided to turn it into a blog that gloated at the coming economic crisis that the UK faces. The idea was that it would be a sister site to The Exile.
However, both blogs have always had a fair number of sleazy postings that aim at increasing the readership. You really should hit on the "Sleaze" and "Celebrities" labels to get a feel for how it works. It's a bit like you with your relationship and emotions crap I suppose - just giving the punters what they want.
Last night's posting fell into that category, which is why it is labelled "Sleaze".
Once you lot drift away I will take stock of my new readership and get back to the main theme. In the meantime good luck with your barnie and you and whatshername are more than welcome to continue it here if you wish. I have written to her to say that as it does seem a bit unfair that her side of the story is not being put directly to my readers.
Exile I have to say that you actually made me laugh out loud! Thank you for your relationship advice which I will note although you're a few years too late as I'm very happily settled down with my partner and baby. I think it's fairly safe to say that to make a baby his balls got "emptied".
I don't want you to take my side at all - I don't know where you came away with that one! You're going to write what you're going to write - I just don't understand why you would *encourage* somebody to break the law because that is exactly what she will be doing if she comes over here to give 'her side' of the story. Wouldn't it be better to wait till she has her appeal next week and then have her give her side of the story to you? Why bait her into breaking the law by breaching the ASBO?
Anyway good luck Exile with the sleaze and celebrity - there's plenty of it out there!
You're not going to believe this but I have no idea what an ASBO even is. Have you any idea how long it is since I left the UK? John Major was PM and that little scab Kinnock was opposition leader...
As for a court case, OK, but I knew nothing about that - nor cared - when I wrote this piece which had really little to do with you or your fight.
As I have already said, this was just about getting punters in so that advertisers can see my hit counter and feel all nice and warm inside as they spend money with me.
Your advertisers will see you taking the part of a deranged stalker - who has been jailed for harassing her ex, his father, then rejailed a few years later for harassing a bomb victim and 15 other people, including NML.
If this is the extent of your 'research', before posting, then why would anyone want to advertise on your site? You obviously care nothing for accuracy.
An ASBO is an anti-social-behaviour order. In Flecity Lowde's case, it prevents her writing about or contacting 16 people whom she has harassed.
One of whom is Natalie, a woman with a family and partner. Natalie warned Lowde off writing about her in the post to which you grotesquely refer as a 'cat fight'.
It is, in fact, an innocent victim, protected by court order, addressing a criminal, who has stalked her and is legally bound not to write about her.
By inciting Lowde to comment further, you are encouraging her to break the law.
You are, in effect, assisting a criminal.
Breach of the ASBO is a separate offence and Lowde is looking at up to 5 years in jail as she is a serial offender with a track record of breaching bail and court orders.
The stalker, Lowde had found an inaccurrate and defamatory article in the Mail and seized it as an opportunity to break the law and attack one of her victims, again.
The stalker, Lowde is in Crown court again on Monday, so to provoke her as you have done is particularly serious.
I will therefore be writing to your advertisers with a screen grab of your posts and your post on FJL's site, asking them if they care about advertising on the site of a man whose research is so sloppy, whose attitudes to women is so hateful, and whose contempt for the law means he is inciting a stalker to further abuse her victims, in defiance of a court order specifically preventing her from doing so.
I wonder what your advertisers will say?
Alternatively, you can edit or remove your postings so that they are more accurate and reflect the fact that you are wholly mistaken - you have tried to incite a convicted harasser to commit further harassment crimes.
Links to the BBC, and other media have been given to you so you can be in no doubt at all as to the facts.
Your call.
Finally, your increased hits are from people following the Lowde case - who are hardly likely to view you or your advertisers positively - and from Lowde, a bankrupt criminal - and from 'webmongs' and trolls
not exactly a good audience for any advertiser.
And I'll be pointing that out to the advertisers I wrote to as well.
Hmmm.....
welcome to the wrestling match that is the "they are all out to get me" Miss Loude v.s "we are all out to get you cos you stalked/harassed/made false police reports about us gang"
Something besides the strong "we shall not surrender" mentality on both sides has come out of it which is http://streamsofuttergoo.blogspot.com which takes the mickey out of all sides involved.
'I will therefore be writing to your advertisers with a screen grab of your posts and your post on FJL's site, asking them if they care about advertising on the site of a man whose research is so sloppy, whose attitudes to women is so hateful, and whose contempt for the law means he is inciting a stalker to further abuse her victims, in defiance of a court order specifically preventing her from doing so.'
Threats and intimidation. Nice.
Threat? Intimidation?
Doesn't look like that to me. Threats and intimidation is what Felicity Lowde was jailed for - since when is alerting advertisers to objectionable content a 'threat' or 'intimidation'? The blogger published it. He can deal with the consequences.
The facts are....
1. Felicity Lowde, a convicted stalker seizes the chance to further abuse one of her victims when a defamatory and false story about the victim is published in the Daily Mail.
2. The victim points out to the stalker that they have broken the court order in the comments.
3. The author of this blog then writes an inaccurate and defamatory article, admits he hasn't bothered to check the facts, insults the victim, attempts to incite the criminal to commit further crimes, publishes a load of misogynistic badly-written inaccurate nonsense - and admits it is done to attract hits to please his advertisers.
He goes on to accuse his readers of being trolls, and webmongs and hysterical girls.
Is this the environment and audience the advertisers seek?
Well - time to write to them and ask them!
After all - they are the ones who count, right?
I'm about to write to all of them - but how about I give the blog author til 4pm BST?
The blog author
could voluntarily back down, remove the defamation, cease inciting a criminal to further break the law and edit his posts, couldn't he?
I am sure that would make his advertisers very happy.
Incidentally - I have just checked - the Mail have already taken down the defamatory article, which the Press Complaints Commission are investigating.
You can draw an inference from that - and act accordingly.
Here are the contact details of your advertisers, who are placed on your site by matched.co.uk
Contact Us
* By Phone:
o 01329 820 866
o We are open from Monday - Friday from 9am to 5pm (UK time)
* By Email:
o customerservice@matched.co.uk
* By Post:
o Netbasic Ltd,
9 Funtley Court,
Funtley Hill,
Fareham,
Hants,
P016 7UY
You've got til 4pm UK Time. Then I'm going to tell Matched.co.uk that they are displaying advertising on a blog which is defamatory, contains false and misleading information, links to pornography, and whose owner is currently inciting a convicted criminal harrasser, who is in court on Monday, to commit further crimes punishable by up to 5 further years in jail.
Then I'm going to write to guidemeto, djehotels, yourwebsense, wantatravel, dwinsinder and tell them the same.
Then I'm going to email some pals and provide them with the linsk as well.
Or you can act to remove the defamation, as the Mail - with all their lawyers and money - have done.
Your call - the clock is ticking.
So Delighted.
'Morning Webmongs, and a special top of the morning to the stupid slag from Telewest Broadband who uses Windows XP as her OS and Firefox as her browser. I see that her screen resolution is set to 1024 X 768, with a colour depth of 32 bits. Not very good for running video, I fear. You need to update to Vista...
Now then, you listen to me you little cunt. I can not only track your ISP - it runs 77.102.81 in case you were wondering, but I can track you down as a real live individual.
Want to put me to the test?
Breakfast time! Play nice boys and girls and I will be back later.
Just a quickie - I'm closing this thread down, but that doesn't mean that you can't play.
All comments and threats should now be left at the "Street Fighting Girls Visit The Money Blog" posting.
Anonymous at 05.41:
You are wasting your time because the silly little slag is so full of self righteous anger that she can't see that she is doing exactly what she condemns others for. Not to worry as I shall pass this information along to the to the other one. I am sure that it will please her and her crew.
Naah, forget it mate, that's my advice. Not worth mithering over a stupid cow who might be good to fuck, but who is good for fuck all else.